[rollei_list] Re: Rollei Mutar vs RolleiWIDE/TELE vs Mamiya C330
- From: "Peter K." <peterk727@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 14:43:48 -0700
I have both Mutars and they are pretty damn good. Those that say they are
fair have nor really used them. Usually its someone who believes they are
fair and never owned one.
Peter K
On 7/17/05, Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Andrea,
>
> If I needed a 6x6cm camera for wide angle as well as normal and telephoto,
>
> I would get a Hasselblad with 50mm, 80mm and 150mm lenses, rather than
> three Rolleiflexes. In fact, that is just what I have and use. Or would
> YOUR
> subjects consider that "pro like equipment". What would they think of you
> with THREE Rolleiflexes hanging around your neck? Forget the Mamamiya,
> it is a FPITA to use.
>
> Jerry
>
> andrearicci@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> Hi everyoneI have a rolleiflex 3,5 and I am interested in completing an
> outfit allowing me to have a completely mechanical outfit to be used in
> locations where top gear does not really work well (eiher because of the
> weather or because locals get nervous when they see "pro like equipment"
> targeting their faces...)Old TLRs are notoriously better precisely for these
> questions? Can anyone suggest a rational strategy ?Should I go for the
> mutars, spend the money it's needed and get the special rolleis or go for a
> mamiya C330?This is an opinion I have found on photo.net<http://photo.net/>
> QUOTE
> "...The 1.5x Mutar is passable, the 0.7x Mutar is below par. The add-on
> Tele-Wide lenses for the Yashicamats are no worse, if you've got a Bay-I
> Rollei try a set and get it out of your system. If you really want other
> than a standard lens on a TLR you'll have to spring for a Rolleiwide and a
> Tele-Rollei or get a Mamiya C330."END QUOTE
>
> What do you think ?
> Thanks Andrea
>
>
--
Peter K
Ó¿Õ¬
Other related posts:
