[rollei_list] Re: Rodinal & Neopan results
- From: "Jerry Laderberg" <jerry@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:43:59 -0400
Rodinal looks fine to me. You might try Hyfinal if you want a little less "
snap". It's totally personal.
----- Original Message -----
From: Jan Decher
To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 10:45 AM
Subject: [rollei_list] Rodinal & Neopan results
Hi Everyone,
This "Donkeys in WIlliston, VT" series are the first three results from the
roll of Neopan 400 I processed in my "old" Rodinal 1:50 for 11 minutes (as
recommended on the Rodinal box and the "Massive Development Chart"):
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mittelformat/
It got a bit too contrasty for my taste so I struggled a bit to make it work
in the digital environment and I know the negs won't be a pleasure to work with
in the darkroom. Perhaps the developer was a tad too cold (1/2 a degree
Celsius) ??
Two pictures ot the Montreal olympic tower against the blue sky are worthless
becasue the sky and tower ended up almost white in white (on this note: I am
looking for a clean Bay II orange filter!)
I may go back to Sprint Developer or D76 for Neopan 400. Definitely need a
softer result for "Mother and baby" shoot I have planned with my 3.5E.
Any suggestions?
Jan
On Mar 24, 2009, at 1:07 AM, FreeLists Mailing List Manager wrote:
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:35:28 -0700
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Rodinal Question
From: Richard Sintchak <rich815@xxxxxxxxx>
I've used 5+ year old stuff that was not brown, but BLACK. Worked fine.
--
Richard S.
San Francisco
Other related posts:
