> --- El lun 28-sep-09, aghalide@xxxxxxx <aghalide@xxxxxxx> escribió: > >> Why is it no one has mentioned the 23 x 34 mm Nikon? > > The 24mm x 32mm "Nikon" frame format was initially adopted for these reasons: > 1 The 3:4 proportion seemed to have better proportions than the "Leica" format > 24x36mm (2:3). > 2 It could take 40 frames and was more economical than the "Leica" format of > 36 frames. > 3 The standard of the slide projector provided by the Japanese Ministry of > Education was 24 x 32 mm. > > This frame format was abandoned about 1949 when the USA market started to be > significant for the Nikon cameras, the picture size of the "Nikon" format (24 > x 32 mm) did not correspond to the automatic color slide cutting machines that > were used in the U.S.A.;those machines operated with the Leica format (24 x 36 > mm), the pictures would be incorrectly cut. > > Carlos > > > > > Yahoo! Cocina > > Encontra las mejores recetas con Yahoo! Cocina. > > > http://ar.mujer.yahoo.com/cocina/ > --- > Rollei List > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' > in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Online, searchable archives are available at > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list > The "Leica" format I believe started out as a 40 frame idea. I just read that somewhere. A thing on Barnack. Mark William Rabiner --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list