[rollei_list] Re: OT / prove it !
- From: Eric Goldstein <egoldste@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 21:13:45 -0500
Yes. Even at 5 x 7, the smaller format suffers by comparison.
Eric Goldstein
Peter K. wrote:
> I think what you are saying is that there are a great resolution of
> lpmm in a smaller format. However, when you enlarge you lose. Or if
> you were to drop a smaller portion of the 120 negative you to 35mm
> size you would not have as sharp a image from it as an entire 35mm
> negative. Correct?
>
> Peter K=20
>
>
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 19:23:01 -0500, Austin Franklin <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> w=
> rote:
>> Hi Eric,
>>> If you want real shgarpness at enlargement, you don't shoot 35 mm...
>> I don't follow you. 35mm is typically sharper than larger formats, per
>> square area of negative space.
>> =20
>> Regards,
>> =20
>> Austin
>> =20
>> =20
>
>
> --=20
> Peter K
> =D3=BF=D5=AC
>
Other related posts:
