I have a 6008 and a 6003. I much prefer the size of the 6003! =0AFrank=0A= =0A----- Original Message ----=0AFrom: John Wild <JWild@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx= .uk>=0ATo: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx=0ASent: Thursday, 21 February, 2008 5:= 01:25 PM=0ASubject: [rollei_list] Re: MF SLR lens designations=0A=0AHi Stan= ,=0A=0AAs you say, the 6006/2 metering does not work when in manual mode.= =0A=0AThe 6006/8 are quite bulky with the film magazine. I have a 6002 whic= h=0Asits in the hand better, much more like a TLR. A 6003 (produced=0Aorigi= nally with 1/500th and latterly with 1/1000th shutter speed) will=0Agive th= e full metering capability with the reduced size and the later=0Aones can u= se magazines when fitted with the additional film gate=0Aaccessory. As with= an SLX and 6002 the backs are interchangeable for 6 x=0A45 but not mid rol= l.=0A=0AI do not know if a 6002/SLX back can be used on a 6006 but accordin= g to=0Athe Rollei user manual, a 6006 magazine should not be used on a 6002= =0Abecause the gearing/motor is not man enough and also the lens to film=0A= register is different. Both of these I find difficult to believe because=0A= surely Rollei would not have produced two different body castings; one=0Afo= r the 6002 and one for the 6006. Similarly with the drive=0Amotors/gears. T= he SLX I can understand because it was only designed for=0Ause with backs a= s opposed to magazines.=0A=0ARegards=0A=0AJohn=0A=0A=0A=0A-----Original Mes= sage-----=0AFrom: rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx=0A[mailto:rollei_list-bo= unce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stan Yoder=0ASent: 21 February 2008 13:31= =0ATo: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx=0ASubject: [rollei_list] Re: MF SLR lens d= esignations=0A=0A=3D20=0AAs the original poster of this thread, I thank all= who have contributed.=0A=0AI find that manual exposure with the 6006 is a = chore, unless an external=0Ameter is used. The over/under LEDs in the VF do= n't work in that mode, so=0AI have to use the preview button in Auto mode a= nd see what the f-stop=0Aindicator says, then vary + or - from that in manu= al mode, if the=0Asubject/lighting demands.=0A=0AAnd with an "EL" lens (I h= ave the 50 Distagon) there is not even the=0Amoving f-stop indicator, so Au= to is the only option (other than an=0Aexternal meter.)=0A=0AThis is not to= say that Auto mode is bad, much of the time.=0A=0AI've used the TLRs for y= ears, and by comparison I find my=0Arecently-acquired 6006 to be bulky, hea= vy, and noisy, esp. the latter.=0AIMHO, it really is not a field camera, bu= t lens interchangeability is a=0Aplus, compared with using the Mutars on th= e TLR.=0A=0AStan Yoder=0A---=0ARollei List=0A=0A- Post to rollei_list@freel= ists.org=0A=0A- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscr= ibe'=3D20=0Ain the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org=0A=0A= - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in=0A= the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org=0A=0A- Online, searc= hable archives are available at=0A//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_= list=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A---=0ARollei List=0A=0A- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxx= rg=0A=0A- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' = =0Ain the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org=0A=0A- Unsubsc= ribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with =0A'unsubscribe' in the subj= ect field OR by logging into www.freelists.org=0A=0A- Online, searchable ar= chives are available at=0A//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list