[rollei_list] Re: "Advantage of 4x5 over medium format" (was: Austin has ...
- From: "Jim Somberg" <jimsberg_04@xxxxxxx>
- To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 09:55:46 -0700
Get over it...'twas merely an error and previously addressed.
----- Original Message -----
From: Jerry Lehrer
To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 9:44 AM
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: "Advantage of 4x5 over medium format" (was: Austin
has ...
SF,
There ain't no such thing as a 220 "T"! Never was.
Jerry
siufai@xxxxxx wrote:
> > Have you ever tried a Rolleikin? shoots verticals in the normal TLR
holding
> > position; horizontals require a prism and pistol grip.
>
> Yes I have. And you can comfortably shoot horizontals without the prism,
just
> use the sport-finder instead ;-)
>
> > I regularly use the Rollei
> > 645 conversion kit on one of my Rollei Ts to get the extra four exposures
(32
> > on 220 film) with a format close to the standard print sizes.
>
> ???????? You have one of those 12/24 or in your case a 16/32 Rolleiflex T?
>
> > The square
> > format cannot be beat for flash pix, however, since the flash when
attached
> > to the camera is always on top and you can make the vertical v. horizontal
> > decision after the pix are taken.
>
> I do have a problem with flash pix, since I can't reach the focus knob with
a
> 45CT4 attached and I have no other flash that works better.
>
> Best,
>
> Siu Fai
Other related posts:
