[rollei_list] Re: "Advantage of 4x5 over medium format" (was: Austin has ...

  • From: "Bob Creason" <rcreason-1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 22:04:22 -0600

Graphlex referred to it as 'Mahoganite'.  Whatever that is.

Bob C.



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Somberg" <jimsberg_04@xxxxxxx>
To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 9:14 PM
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: "Advantage of 4x5 over medium format" (was:
Austin has ...


> What/which thermoplastic material? Bakelite?
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Jerry Lehrer
>   To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>   Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 7:06 PM
>   Subject: [rollei_list] Re: "Advantage of 4x5 over medium format" (was:
Austin has ...
>
>   Jim,
>
>   I hate to tell you (he lied) that Bakelite was not used as the body
>   material for the Century Graphics.  A thermoplastic material was
>   used.
>
>   Jerry
>
>   Jim Somberg wrote:
>
>   > "If you want to use roll film, get a 2x3 graphic and not a 4x5 ...
>   > > carrying a
>   > > 4x5 around to shoot roll film is absurd."
>   > And the best 2 1/4X 3 1/4 is the Century Graphic with the bakelite
body...actually, there are reasons to use roll film in a Graphic--close-ups
are easier than with the TLR and the somewhat limited tilt and swings are
useful. And the cost of one is a lot less than the SLR Rolleis for those
close-ups. Plus there a billion or so cheap decent lenses available.
>   >
>   > Jim
>   >
>   >   ----- Original Message -----
>   >   From: Thor Legvold
>   >   To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>   >   Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 1:45 PM
>   >   Subject: [rollei_list] Re: "Advantage of 4x5 over medium format"
(was: Austin has ...
>   >
>   >   I don't really want to shoot roll film with a Graphic, that's what
the
>   >   Rollei is for. And the Nikon is for when I want to reminisce and
shoot
>   >   a roll or two of Kodachrome ;-)
>   >
>   >   "mamma don't take my Kodachrome away"
>   >   -Paul Simon
>   >   --
>   >   Thor
>   >
>   >   On 19. apr. 2005, at 22.06, TrueBadger@xxxxxxx wrote:
>   >
>   >   > In a message dated 4/19/2005 4:00:46 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
>   >   > siufai@xxxxxx
>   >   > writes:
>   >   >> And make certain it has the Graflok back so you can use the
readily
>   >   >> available
>   >   >>> 120 roll film backs.
>   >   >>
>   >   >> I have a RH10 but I seldom use it since it's like using a
Rolleikin
>   >   >> on a
>   >   >> Rolleiflex.
>   >   >>
>   >   >> Best regards,
>   >   >>
>   >   >> Siu Fai
>   >   >>
>   >   >>
>   >   >
>   >   > If you want to use roll film, get a 2x3 graphic and not a 4x5 ...
>   >   > carrying a
>   >   > 4x5 around to shoot roll film is absurd.
>   >   >
>   >   > G. King
>   >   >
>   >   >
>   >   >
>
>
>
>


Other related posts: