[rollei_list] Re: "Advantage of 4x5 over medium format" (was: Austin has ...
- From: Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 10:05:15 -0700
Jim,
But SF is perpetuating a lie! People will start to believe him.
Remember what Alice said. Or was it the Mad Hatter?
(What I say 3 times is true)
jerry
Jim Somberg wrote:
> Get over it...'twas merely an error and previously addressed.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jerry Lehrer
> To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 9:44 AM
> Subject: [rollei_list] Re: "Advantage of 4x5 over medium format" (was:
> Austin has ...
>
> SF,
>
> There ain't no such thing as a 220 "T"! Never was.
>
> Jerry
>
> siufai@xxxxxx wrote:
>
> > > Have you ever tried a Rolleikin? shoots verticals in the normal TLR
> holding
> > > position; horizontals require a prism and pistol grip.
> >
> > Yes I have. And you can comfortably shoot horizontals without the prism,
> just
> > use the sport-finder instead ;-)
> >
> > > I regularly use the Rollei
> > > 645 conversion kit on one of my Rollei Ts to get the extra four
> exposures (32
> > > on 220 film) with a format close to the standard print sizes.
> >
> > ???????? You have one of those 12/24 or in your case a 16/32 Rolleiflex T?
> >
> > > The square
> > > format cannot be beat for flash pix, however, since the flash when
> attached
> > > to the camera is always on top and you can make the vertical v.
> horizontal
> > > decision after the pix are taken.
> >
> > I do have a problem with flash pix, since I can't reach the focus knob
> with a
> > 45CT4 attached and I have no other flash that works better.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Siu Fai
Other related posts:
