After I wrote that I started thinking wow my poor brooms get abused. Jack G From: roc-chat-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:roc-chat-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stephen Beal Sent: Monday, August 08, 2011 1:32 PM To: roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: <roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [roc-chat] Re: Old Dr. Rocket 98mm forward closure with ejection well? Jack, Your brooms do get around in rocketry. Stephen On Aug 8, 2011, at 1:26 PM, Jack Garibaldi <jackgaribaldi@xxxxxxx> wrote: Oh John one more thing they will officially tell you that they were not certified with them so no warranty but they will work, I lost a smoke charge at a launch one time and cut off a piece of my broom handle and wrapped electrical tape to snug fit it and it was glorious. Jack G From: roc-chat-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:roc-chat-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Howard Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2011 11:34 AM To: roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [roc-chat] Old Dr. Rocket 98mm forward closure with ejection well? Anyone know if the old style Dr. Rocket 98mm forward closure with an ejection well will work with current AT loads? I can't find much on the web, and only have found two Dr Rocket closures on his ancient website with http://wayback.archive.org/web/. One is listed as regular, the other as extended. Aerotech and Rouse-Tech only make a normal length enclosure now. So I'm assuming that extended 98mm closures won't work anymore? I did find that delay's for the 98mm are no longer approved for use, but one could plug the hole for the ignition of the charge, and use it as a plugged closure. But one of these is scrap metal if I can't really use it in the future. Thanks, John P.S. Attached is pic of one <webkit-fake-url://4BA527CF-CE1D-4C9C-88BF-602B76307C7A/image.tiff>