[roc-chat] Re: Old Dr. Rocket 98mm forward closure with ejection well?
- From: Stephen Beal <swbeal07@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 13:32:15 -0700
Jack,
Your brooms do get around in rocketry.
Stephen
On Aug 8, 2011, at 1:26 PM, Jack Garibaldi <jackgaribaldi@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Oh John one more thing they will officially tell you that they were not
> certified with them so no warranty but they will work, I lost a smoke charge
> at a launch one time and cut off a piece of my broom handle and wrapped
> electrical tape to snug fit it and it was glorious.
>
>
>
> Jack G
>
>
>
> From: roc-chat-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:roc-chat-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of John Howard
> Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2011 11:34 AM
> To: roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [roc-chat] Old Dr. Rocket 98mm forward closure with ejection well?
>
>
>
> Anyone know if the old style Dr. Rocket 98mm forward closure with an ejection
> well will work with current AT loads?
>
>
>
> I can't find much on the web, and only have found two Dr Rocket closures on
> his ancient website with http://wayback.archive.org/web/. One is listed as
> regular, the other as extended. Aerotech and Rouse-Tech only make a normal
> length enclosure now. So I'm assuming that extended 98mm closures won't work
> anymore?
>
>
>
> I did find that delay's for the 98mm are no longer approved for use, but one
> could plug the hole for the ignition of the charge, and use it as a plugged
> closure. But one of these is scrap metal if I can't really use it in the
> future.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> John
>
>
>
> P.S. Attached is pic of one
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
