[real-eyes] Re: Google Accessibility
- From: "&&& (Ruthie)" <clark.ruthie@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: real-eyes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:29:34 -0600
I don't know what is wrong with google? I've been using
https://encrypted.google.com/ for a long time with zero problem. The
results are 100% accessible. Am I totally missing something? Just curious.
&&& (Ruthie)
Modem: A great deterrent to phone solicitors
"We are more than the sum of our parts."
We are the few,
Who speak for the many,
Who could not speak for themselves.
We are the many,
Who speak for the one,
Who could not speak for herself.
Private mail is *always* welcomehere <mailto:multi.we.us@xxxxxxxxx>
Windows Live: clark.ruthie@xxxxxxxxx Follow us on Twitter: @MultiWe
Facebook: Ruthie Clark <http://www.facebook.com/andruthieand> Yahoo!
andruthieand Check out the blog: at WordPress
<http://multiwe.wordpress.com/>!
On 12/15/2011 11:31 AM, Luis Guerra wrote:
> Thank you very much for posting this useful information!
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Glenn"<GlennErvin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To:<real-eyes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 9:29 AM
> Subject: [real-eyes] Re: Google Accessibility
>
>
> The Google accessible page used to have an option to change the number of
> results.
> I'm now using:
> http://www.scroogle.org/scraper.html
> for my home page.
> It uses Google, but makes a cleaner page than the accessible Google was.
>
> Glenn
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jim Fettgather"<jimfettgather@xxxxxxxxx>
> To:<real-eyes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 12:17 AM
> Subject: [real-eyes] Re: Google Accessibility
>
>
> The so called Google accessible search page lacks lots and lots of features
> such as being able to change the numbers of results per page and setting
> filters for content.
> This google accessible search page is woefully inadequate, and is a poor
> substitute for the formerly accessible main page.
> The Google search settings were accessible at one time, but the radio
> buttons have turned to sliders that appear to be inaccessible from the
> keyboard.
> I have used the Window Eyes mouse commands to be able to change these
> sliders, but it's a pain.
>
> Definitely a step backwards in accessibility.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Luis Guerra
> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 5:13 PM
> To: real-eyes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [real-eyes] Google Accessibility
>
> I find Google search settings are now inaccessible with Jaws 12 due to new
> slider controls. #Google #accessibility
>
> To subscribe or to leave the list, or to set other subscription options, go
> to www.freelists.org/list/real-eyes
>
>
> To subscribe or to leave the list, or to set other subscription options, go
> to www.freelists.org/list/real-eyes
>
>
> To subscribe or to leave the list, or to set other subscription options, go
> to www.freelists.org/list/real-eyes
>
>
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.1890 / Virus Database: 2108/4682 - Release Date: 12/15/11
>
> To subscribe or to leave the list, or to set other subscription options, go
> to www.freelists.org/list/real-eyes
>
>
To subscribe or to leave the list, or to set other subscription options, go to
www.freelists.org/list/real-eyes
Other related posts:
