[racktables-users] Re: help wanted with RHEL

  • From: Colin Coe <colin.coe@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: racktables-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:05:53 +0800

Hi Dean

I'm pretty sure your statement is correct: EPEL compliments RHEL, it
doesn't replace any of RHEL.  So one could not redo pcre with unicode
properties support and put it in EPEL.

CC

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Dean Hamstead <dean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> My understanding is that EPEL doesnt over-write RHEL packages?
>
> However epel for rhel6 beta is now out. Although this doesnt help anyone who
> cant wait to deploy when RHEL6 is released ;(
>
> Dean
>
> Colin Coe wrote:
>>
>> Agreed, but RedHat have this habit of not making changes in RHEL where
>> user impact my be felt.
>>
>> CC
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Denis Ovsienko <infrastation@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> 17.06.2010, 06:15, "Colin Coe" <colin.coe@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>>>
>>>> Hey all
>>>>
>>>> I've been out of action for a bit and am trying to catch up on this
>>>> thread. As the RPM maintainer for Fedora and EPEL, I'm wondering if I
>>>> need to leave RackTables on the 0.17 branch for RHEL 4&5, and move to
>>>> the 0.18 branch for Fedora 12+.
>>>>
>>>> Does that sound right or have I missed something?
>>>
>>> I guess, a better way would be to resolve the PCRE issue in RHEL and to
>>> have one version everywhere.
>>>
>>> --
>>>   Denis Ovsienko
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> http://fragfest.com.au
>
>



-- 
RHCE#805007969328369

Other related posts: