[pure-silver] Re: Your best enlarging lens

  • From: `Richard Knoppow <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 10:40:43 -0800

The experience here seems to point to a real difference. The APO Rodagons seem to be the best of the bunch, although they really are not apochromatic according to their published data. They have extremely good color correction but apochromatism has a very specific definition and the lenses don't meet it. Probably of no practical consequence.
The illumination of a lens of normal construction varies with the angle of view. So, using a longer lens for enlarging will improve the center to corner uniformity of illumination. This generally gets a little better as the lens is stopped down because when wide open the edge of the mount obstructs the light path. About two stops down from wide open overcomes this but you can see it. Some lenses have extra large end elements to eliminate this effect.
Because of the height limit of my enlarger I use a slightly shorter lens for 4x5 but use a dodger to burn in the corners when printing from a full negative.
Contrast is critical for color work but less so for B&W because overall contrast can be compensated to some degree. However, what is called edge contrast remains important because it affects what is interpreted by the eye as sharpness.
Rodenstock specifies the optimum magnification ratio of their lenses. Any lens can be optimized in design for a specific ratio. It's corrections will not be as good at other ratios. I have not looked at a Rodenstock catalog recently but they used to offer different versions of some lenses for different optimum magnifications. This is one of the reasons that camera lenses are often not very satisfactory as enlarging lenses.
Lenses like the Rodagon also work very well on cameras for macro work.

On 11/26/2019 10:22 AM, Luis Miguel Castañeda wrote:


`Richard Knoppow writes:

 I doubt if there is enough difference between Rodenstock and  Schneider to be concerned about.

I do prefer the rodagons over the componons, by a huge leap. But... it's a matter of my own preferences. Can't complain about componon performance or even nikkor, but I like my prints better when done with rodenstock glass.

Specially the Apo-Rodagon 80. I have a few others from 50 to 300mm, but that one is the one that pleases me more. Ah, and an old meogon (meopta lens) which always delivered, but it's a bit dark.



--
Richard Knoppow
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
WB6KBL
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your 
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) 
and unsubscribe from there.

Other related posts: