[pure-silver] Re: OT: Color IQ Test

  • From: "Eric Neilsen Photo" <ej@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 10:11:56 -0600

That's why I joking said that Bob was probably ready to start using some of
those pills when it was all done, or perhaps just a libation or two. 

Eric Neilsen
Eric Neilsen Photography
4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9
Dallas, TX 75226
 
www.ericneilsenphotography.com
skype me with ejprinter
 

-----Original Message-----
From: pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jean-David Beyer
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 9:46 AM
To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: OT: Color IQ Test

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Eric Neilsen Photo wrote:
| Jean-David, The human eye doesn't process the film, it looks at the
| processed film. It doesn't process the paper; it looks at it. It
| doesn't project the light that falls on the subject and can't
| physically effect it directly. The reality of the hard side of the
| image creation is what many don't know about; real limits built into
| the physical elements.

OK. I guess we are drifting from the comments on that color test
originally posted, and how good the monitors and room lighting had to be
to do the test in question.

If we are talking about producing transparancy images, or ultimately,
printed images, all the issues you discussed _do_ matter -- a lot.
|
| I know Bob could see all these things happening. The ability to see
| the colors doesn't always translate into knowing how to do something
| with them.
|
True enough.


=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your 
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) 
and unsubscribe from there.

Other related posts: