[pure-silver] Re: Bokeh - no longer relevant? (some fun stuff for Friday)

  • From: Photovergne <wilbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 15:22:31 +0100

Point him to this link http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/bokeh-comparison.htm and he won't think that bokeh is a fancy word of academia anymore.


On 18/01/2013 9:11 AM, Dana Myers wrote:


Someone I know recently got a new camera. Her son is teaching her photography. She mentioned "shallow depth of field" and I suggested she should ask her
son about "bokeh".

Here's the conversation that followed - am I being too harsh? Who is teaching
the kids these days?!?!

Son: Bokeh is the fancy term for things that are out of focus. However I
     usually hear it used primarily to described out of focus highlights
     or lights that become more like orbs. For example the bumper/credit
for Focus Features is a focus pull of several different color lights. However, Bokeh can be used to described all blur/haze in out of focus
     areas of an image.

Me: bokeh is not a fancy term. it's something real and transcends "stuff out of focus". it's "how appealing stuff out of focus is". don't deprecate what 100 years of photography learned before we switched from film to
     digital sensors

Son: I am not saying it isn't a valuable part of creative composition of an
     image. I just feel that the word is not commonly used to describe
shallow depth of field in everyday discussion of imagery. Making it to me, a fancy word of academia that most only know as out of focus highlights and not a general description of lack of focus in photography. The word I feel no longer is used properly or often enough to make it as relevant anymore.

Me: I hope bokeh isn't commonly used to describe "shallow depth of field", because that would be incorrect usage. It's used to describe how *pleasant* out-of-focus things look and is as relevant as ever as a key attribute of a "good" lens - it isn't a "fancy word of academia" and that it isn't "used properly or often enough to make it relevant" reflects more on who you're talking about it with: see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bokeh

Dana K6JQ

============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.


============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.

=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your 
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) 
and unsubscribe from there.

Other related posts: