[pskmail] Re: 2.1.0-d COM port PTT?
- From: Pär Crusefalk <per@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pskmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 09:20:07 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
victor maddex skrev 2013-09-09 15:38:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I see things are moving on, but has there been any progress on PTT
control for this version ?
>
> Thanks
>
> Vic
I have not done anything there, perhaps Rein has?
Perhaps it's time again to discuss the future direction regarding
version one and two btw?
A lot of things have happened to fldigi in recent months (it's useable
once again) and playing catch up with the java implementation may or may
not be worth the effort?
73, Per
sm0rwo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSLsgnAAoJENJa8unLWIP2vmcH/RhN/jt6lM7esO6TAhWuEgpK
vK8rW899XnSF+bePlsYa2oxD1DGAwjJMzIJoZNpBE24csw1jLhiTeYw5pOvQt5dJ
Qa5kK6Ekzzvv7h/XvPpBEAGmhTYggM7WXXPeV/3jHnJxaR/nHbAwDvcp7FGu5KfK
dRhEJq9Qtp7wVBtvHqZCU3Xzd4h7+Ik3sLCVeon0pfIZ6coj82baK7dxebPqlOwX
eUPi9oLpiz9LH9exv6O5ajQa7mNMGo2v5fLSfjWnCCilfbFpS7GiRt5pdwM4Nkp7
ghhghXFgAAGckQyR8VrRRYHra5wQZyJC4wrZcBUEiuswtWckBsX5cdVXFghYG5k=
=JqPK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Other related posts:
