[projectaon] Re: The Curse of Naar Errata - Part II
- From: Jonathan Blake <jonathan.blake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 08:27:50 -0800
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:54 AM, Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Jonathan Blake wrote:
> Should I take the agreement with the (ft) in Section 90 as implicit of
> footnoting 16tlov 60 and 17tdoi 303 with the same footnote? *grin*
Sounds good.
--
Jon
~~~~~~
Manage your subscription at //www.freelists.org/list/projectaon
Other related posts:
