On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 26/04/2011 22:30, Jonathan Blake wrote: > >>>> (er) 79, 163, 234: meal -> Meal >>>> >>>> This would imply that the GM can only use this if a meal is available >>>> according to game rules. I think this is the implication of this >>>> sentence, but capitalizing "meal" would make it more clear. >>> >>> What if you use Grand Huntmastery in lieu of a Meal? >> >> I'm guessing that should work. Do you think capitalizing meal would >> confuse this issue? > > I think that, as written, the issue is already somewhat confused. Maybe > *also* adding a footnote explaining its use would be better from a rules > perspective. > > "You may use the Obhanthor at any time during the game when you are required > to consume a Meal. This would include using Grand Huntmastery in lieu of > eating a Meal from your Backpack." I think the reader should be able to use the potions that are tied to meals whenever they have a Meal (or could acquire one through Grand Huntmastery) and want to use the Meal and erase it from their Action Chart. -- Jon ~~~~~~ Manage your subscription at //www.freelists.org/list/projectaon