On 26/04/2011 22:30, Jonathan Blake wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Simon Osborne<outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On 26/04/2011 20:06, Jonathan Blake wrote:For Trail of the Wolf: (er) 79: [lm: I assume that the jar counts as one item]So, do we footnote it that "This Jar of Obanthor takes up one slot in your Backpack."? (ft) 79, 163, 234: The Jar of Obhanthor takes up one slot in your Backpack.I should have said that in 163 there is a jar of Obhanthor and a jar of Satchwort and in 234 there is a _vial_ of Venell and a _vial_ of Tortwich.
Noted (roughly!) in the Footnotes and Not Errata section.
(er) 79, 163, 234: meal -> Meal This would imply that the GM can only use this if a meal is available according to game rules. I think this is the implication of this sentence, but capitalizing "meal" would make it more clear.What if you use Grand Huntmastery in lieu of a Meal?I'm guessing that should work. Do you think capitalizing meal would confuse this issue?
I think that, as written, the issue is already somewhat confused. Maybe *also* adding a footnote explaining its use would be better from a rules perspective.
"You may use the Obhanthor at any time during the game when you are required to consume a Meal. This would include using Grand Huntmastery in lieu of eating a Meal from your Backpack."
It may not be deemed necessary...I'm just looking at it critically because someone is likely to flag this up in the future. >_<
-- Simon Osborne Project Aon ~~~~~~ Manage your subscription at //www.freelists.org/list/projectaon
