On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Timothy Pederick <pederick@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 19 April 2011 18:04, Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>>> (ft) 230: [JD: should we create a footnote reminding players not >>>> to >>>> forget the +7 CS bonus of either Helshezag or the Dagger of Vashna when >>>> used >>>> against a Darklord?] >>>> <http://www.projectaon.org/test/en/xhtml/lw/12tmod/sect230.htm> >>> >>> Agreed that we should footnote here. I think most readers would rather >>> have the +7CS or +12CS than the surprise. :) >> >> So, should we: >> >> (1) >> >> Footnote a +7CS here and alter the wording of Section 88: "when used >> within the walls of Helgedad" -> "when used against the Archlord"? >> >> (2) >> >> Footnote a +12CS here, which is consistent, but spoils the surprise of >> Section 88, particularly for first-time readers? > > Given these choices, I'd side with (1). > > A possible third option would be to make mention of the alternative > interpretation, but hide it away rather than put it in the footnote. I'm > thinking of something like the Tarnalin entry options in 02fotw; the > footnote to s.299 has a link to the erratum for the section, and a spoiler > warning. > > Taking our cue from that, we could mention in the erratum to s.88 that the > original wording would imply that the higher bonus is also usable against > Taktaal; we chose to preserve the surprise, but the reader might wish to > choose the alternative. And then we link to that erratum from s.230's > footnote, with a suitable spoiler warning. Something like: > > "Information revealed in a later section may have an effect on how this > fight should be conducted; see the erratum for Section 88 for details. Note > that this will reveal that information to you sooner than the author > intended, which many readers, especially first-time readers, may prefer not > to do." I like this option. -- Jon ~~~~~~ Manage your subscription at //www.freelists.org/list/projectaon