On 26/04/2011 01:21, Jonathan Blake wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Simon Osborne<outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On 25/04/2011 19:15, Jonathan Blake wrote:(er) 8: Clunk!. -> Clunk! [onomatopoeia: ne] Why not "clunk!"? Do we often capitalize onomatopoeiae?No, but they are often already capitalised mid-sentence, which is a perfectly acceptable way to add emphasis to the word, AFAIK. Other capitalised occurrences: 16tlov 273: Crack!; 18dotd 117, 350: Crack!; 21votm 223: Crack!; 23mh 20, 51, 119, 235, 290: Crack!; 24rw 108, 131, 215, 342: Crack!; 25totw 8, 93, 218: Clunk!; 99, 181, 331: Crack!; 175: Clang!; 26tfobm 110, 114, 232, 310, 341: Crack!; 27v 12: Click!; 92: Clang!; 266: Crack!; 28thos 95: Crack! If we plan on changing this, let's do it all in one go while we remember...Eh, I think "Clunk!" is just fine. :)
(Phew!)Fixed/Rejected/Footnoted pretty much everything so far, since the issues didn't seem all that contentious. Haven't touched the Bacteria/Bacterium issue, though; I'll wait for someone better able than I am to comment on that one.
<http://www.projectaon.org/test/en/xhtml/lw/25totw/title.htm> <http://www.projectaon.org/test/en/xhtml-simple/lw/25totw.htm> <http://www.projectaon.org/test/en/xhtml-less-simple/lw/25totw/title.htm>(Note that some of the illustrations currently have the wrong dimensions set in the xml and so may look slightly distorted. This isn't a problem with the scans.)
-- Simon Osborne Project Aon ~~~~~~ Manage your subscription at //www.freelists.org/list/projectaon
