[projectaon] Re: 25totw errata
- From: Jonathan Blake <jonathan.blake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 17:21:39 -0700
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 25/04/2011 19:15, Jonathan Blake wrote:
>>
>> (er) 8: Clunk!. -> Clunk! [onomatopoeia: ne]
>>
>> Why not "clunk!"? Do we often capitalize onomatopoeiae?
>
> No, but they are often already capitalised mid-sentence, which is a
> perfectly acceptable way to add emphasis to the word, AFAIK.
>
> Other capitalised occurrences: 16tlov 273: Crack!; 18dotd 117, 350: Crack!;
> 21votm 223: Crack!; 23mh 20, 51, 119, 235, 290: Crack!; 24rw 108, 131, 215,
> 342: Crack!; 25totw 8, 93, 218: Clunk!; 99, 181, 331: Crack!; 175: Clang!;
> 26tfobm 110, 114, 232, 310, 341: Crack!; 27v 12: Click!; 92: Clang!; 266:
> Crack!; 28thos 95: Crack!
>
> If we plan on changing this, let's do it all in one go while we remember...
Eh, I think "Clunk!" is just fine. :)
--
Jon
~~~~~~
Manage your subscription at //www.freelists.org/list/projectaon
Other related posts:
