Guys, in that case, where can I start "Hunting"? I'd love to put XP on here one of these days, but the HP site just isn't helping me at all in terms of drivers. Someone suggested Driver Magician, will that help me find components for XP?
-- Chris Hallsworth e-mail/MSN: christopherhallsworth71@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx skype: chrishallsworth7266 klango: chrishallsworth----- Original Message ----- From: "Jared Wright" <wright.jaredm@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 7:07 AM Subject: Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)
If you poke around you can most usually find XP drivers for these laptops that ship with Vista. I've had plenty of luck with at least Acers, Asus, HP, and Dell amongst others. And you really just need to do a detailed hardware scan or check online and figure out the exact components and get drivers from the manufacturers of the components rather than the folks who bundled it all together. Just clarifying that with a little hunting most of the time you can still put Windows XP on whatever new laptop you may wish to buy, provided you have a standalone Windows XP license to use. I don't blame you guys that don't want to use Microsoft's latest effort on a daily basis. But sadly if you want something preinstalled with Windows XP you're probably not going to get the most computer for the money at this point. Of course there're parts of the world where the economics might indicate different trends, but I digress.JW black ares wrote:let me tell you a story,I bought a laptop this days, but all manufacturers asociate with Microsoft and offer their laptops with freedos and with drivers only for vista. The manufacturers which don't want to asociate with Microsoft offer their laptops with linux, but their can not offer drivers for windows at all. So I had to search a lot until I found a laptop which still support windows xp.I choose a hp compaq 6730s----- Original Message ----- From: "Octavian Rasnita" <orasnita@xxxxxxxxx>To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 9:53 PM Subject: Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)Well, I use Jaws 6, because the newer versions have issues, and this version of Jaws didn't want to work with the latest driver for my video card. The solution was to install a previous version of the driver for the same video card, and Jaws works very well with it.So there are solutions sometimes. (But I hope I won't need to change very soon the hardware I use now.) Octavian----- Original Message ----- From: "black ares" <matematicianu2003@xxxxxxxxxxx>To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 9:02 PM Subject: Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)for example because the pc vendors force you to do this? How? By not providing to their new components xp drivers.----- Original Message ----- From: "Octavian Rasnita" <orasnita@xxxxxxxxx>To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 8:27 AM Subject: Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)And in this case, why upgrading to Vista? Just because it might have a nicer interface for the sighted which is completely unuseful for me?As I said, I will upgrade only if MS will stop supporting XP, because the security updates are really important.Octavian----- Original Message ----- From: "black ares" <matematicianu2003@xxxxxxxxxxx>To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 11:55 PM Subject: Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)try to answer your self at this question, where you've seen ever a newerwindows consuming less sresources than previous versions?----- Original Message ----- From: "Octavian Rasnita" <orasnita@xxxxxxxxx>To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 11:26 PM Subject: Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)Does that version consume less resources than Win XP? Octavian----- Original Message ----- From: "black ares" <matematicianu2003@xxxxxxxxxxx>To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 10:45 PM Subject: Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)for the vista there is a better alternative named windows server 2008 which is vista with out content protection and for this reason workingwith 18% better than vista.----- Original Message ----- From: "Octavian Rasnita" <orasnita@xxxxxxxxx>To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 8:58 PM Subject: Re: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)Well I guess those millions of users of Vista are those who use acracked version, and that's why their number doesn't show anywhere. :-)I think I will never use Vista. Or just like XP, I will use it, if the next version of Windows will consume more resources than Vista and MSwon't support XP. Octavian ----- Original Message ----- From: "tribble" <lauraeaves@xxxxxxxxx> To: <blind-windows@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <program-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;"bprogramming" <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Science, Technology,Mathematics, SCI-FI, and more." <sci-tech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 8:40 PM Subject: Fw: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters (fwd)Hey all -- What is your take on the following? --le ----- Original Message ----- ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 07:01:21 -0800 From: John Oram <norami@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: LifeRaft <survpc@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: LifeRaft <survpc@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: +[SurvPC] MS-Windows Vista No Longer Matters http://www.microsoft-watch.com/content/vista/windows_vista_no_longer_matters.html October 26, 2008 7:15 PM Windows Vista No Longer Matters News Commentary. Did it ever?Make no mistake: Microsoft has moved beyond Windows Vista, which willbecomeall too apparent during this week's Professional Developer Conference.Windows 7 is the future, and in many ways it's the present, too.Contrary to ridiculous assertions recently made by Microsoft CEO SteveBallmer, Windows Vista is a flop. If businesses aren't buying Vista, after waiting six(now seven) years, it's no success. Yet, during the last day of theGartner2008 expo 10 days ago, Steve asserted that Vista "has been extremelysuccessful."A few days earlier, Steve boasted: "Vista is our best-selling productever. So,if that takes too much getting over—we're not going to have productsthat are much more successful than Vista has been. We sold over 180 million copies in the first 18 months, quite successful." Really?But who's buying this "best-selling" product ever? "We have 180 millionusers,mostly on the consumer market," Steve said in an Oct. 2 speech. Oh?According to Gartner analysts Neil MacDonald and David Smith, only about 10 percent of enterprises have adopted Windows Vista. That's not a high number, particularlyin context of the approximately six years between Windows XP and Vista.It's not surprising then that PDC attendees will hear whole lots aboutWindows7 this week and very little about its predecessor. Windows 7 bannersareplentiful enough, as are the sessions: Out of 194, 22 are dedicated toSevenand none to Windows Vista. It has leprosy, baby, and nobody wants tocatch it. I Googled "PDC 2008," and one of the pages—not now available—is "Unveiling Windows 7 to the World."Vista is headed to as quick a death as Microsoft can give it. Somedaysoon,some gun-toting Microsoft executive will lead Vista out back and "Pop!"Netbookbuying trends and the sagging economy give Microsoft more reasons towant to off Vista as soon as humanly possible. The signs are everywhere:The vanishing license count. Every quarterly earnings since Vista'srelease,Microsoft executives counted up the number of licenses shipped. Therewas near silence during last week's 2009 fiscal first-quarter earnings announcement. The number was 180 million three months earlier. It's now "What?" Microsoft'sfailure to toot "the number of Vista licenses" horn means something.Maybe theincrease wasn't that great, or maybe Microsoft is moving beyond Vista.I say yes to both. Windows client income down. During the fiscal first quarter, the division'srevenue grew a paltry 2 percent year over year, but income decreased by4percent. Microsoft has no tough year-ago comparison to account for theweakresults. By comparison, Business division revenue and income were up 20percent and 23 percent, respectively. Microsoft attributed year-over-year Windows client income declines to sales of lower-cost versions in emerging markets andon netbooks in mature markets. Considering that PC shipment growth wasstillstrong during the quarter, Windows results forebodes Vista weakness.Increasing netbook sales. The product category is pure trouble for Microsoft because Windows Vista demands too much to adequately run on the hardware. So netbooks typically either ship with Linux or Windows XP Home. That netbookbuyers would be satisfied with 7-year-old consumer XP is just about theonlycommentary necessary to understand Vista's market plight. According to Microsoft, netbooks added 8 percent growth to otherwise flat U.S. PCsalesduring the third calendar quarter. The category is hot, but Vista isnot and couldn't be. Seven had better run well on netbooks and soon."Windows. Life Without Walls." The marketing campaign should be called"Windows. Life Without Vista." If Vista is so successful, as Steve claims, then why isn't Microsoft advertising the software? Rather, Microsoft is trying toget away from Vista, abandoning a brand that it already invested tensof millions of dollars promoting. Its absent role at PDC says it all. There are plenty of other signs: Continued OEM sales of XP downgrade licenses The aforementioned 10 percent enterprise adoption Apple's Mac market share gains (35 percent in U.S. retail revenue)Microsoft is moving beyond Vista to Windows 7. Windows Vista no longermatters. If it did: Enterprises would be buying it Consumers would be demanding it Microsoft wouldn't freak out about Apple's "Get a Mac" ads The hottest new computer category, netbooks, would ship with VistaMicrosoft would be aggressively advertising Vista, instead of trying tobury the brandDevelopers would be creating hunky Vista apps; instead, projects likeYahoo Messenger for Windows Vista are being abandonedI've long said that Windows Vista isn't a bad operating system. It'sjust not particularly better than Windows XP. Strange, then, that Microsoft isn'tmessaging Seven as being particularly better than Windows Vista. Itwon't be. Microsoft believes, with some justification, that Vista has major perceptionproblems. The company clearly has decided that negative perceptionscan't befixed. Hence, the diminished emphasis on Vista; starting tomorrow—and especially on Tuesday—an increased emphasis on Windows 7. By shiftingemphasisto Seven, Microsoft is treating Vista perceptions mainly as a marketingproblem. Vista deserved better market reception than it got. Strange, a few small improvements could have changed everything—like startup times. Everybodybitches about how long Vista takes to boot up or wake up from sleep.Last week, one of my longtime Windows buddies bought a MacBook. Yesterday we talked aboutstartup times. He surprised me. He had already clocked startup times: 7minuteson his Vista notebook and about a minute for the $1,299 MacBook. That'snotscientific, but it needn't be. One user, one experience multiplied by180 million Vista licenses is scientific enough. [Please send your tips or rumors to watchtips at gmail.com]. Posted by Joe Wilcox on October 26, 2008 7:15 PM __________ View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind__________ View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind__________ View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind__________ View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind__________ View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind__________ View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind __________View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind__________View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind__________View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind__________View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
__________View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind