Re: Linked lists in C and C++.
- From: "Marlon Brandão de Sousa" <splyt.lists@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:58:25 -0300
it doesn't. You're right, that was right that, I forgot the long thing.
And nice to know you're still on list.
Marlon
2007/10/13, Will Pearson <will@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi,
>
> Marlon wrote:
> "Also, for Sina's explanation about pointers size, I think I recall Will
> Pearson said sometime ago that the pointer size would vary in windows and
> unix implementations on 64 bits platforms."
>
> ... something like that. What I was probably refering to is the ILP model,
> where ILP stands for integers, longs, and pointers. 64-bit Windows uses
> 32-bit integers and longs whilst 64-bit *nix uses 32-bit integers and 64-bit
> longs. Both 64-bit Windows and 64-bit *nix both use 64-bit pointers. So,
> the sizes of data types do differ between the two platforms but for longs
> and not pointers.
>
> I didn't read Sina's explanation, and so I can't comment on how it relates
> to the ILP model.
>
> Will
> __________
> View the list's information and change your settings at
> //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
>
>
--
When you say "I wrote a program that crashed Windows," people just
stare at you blankly and say "Hey, I got those with the system, for
free."
Linus Torvalds
__________
View the list's information and change your settings at
//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
Other related posts:
