Re: Linked lists in C and C++.

  • From: "Marlon Brandão de Sousa" <splyt.lists@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:58:25 -0300

it doesn't. You're right, that was right that, I forgot the long thing.
And nice to know you're still on list.

2007/10/13, Will Pearson <will@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi,
> Marlon wrote:
> "Also, for Sina's explanation about pointers size, I think I recall Will
> Pearson said sometime ago that the pointer size would vary in windows and
> unix implementations on 64 bits platforms."
> ... something like that.  What I was probably refering to is the ILP model,
> where ILP stands for integers, longs, and pointers.  64-bit Windows uses
> 32-bit integers and longs whilst 64-bit *nix uses 32-bit integers and 64-bit
> longs.  Both 64-bit Windows and 64-bit *nix both use 64-bit pointers.  So,
> the sizes of data types do differ between the two platforms but for longs
> and not pointers.
> I didn't read Sina's explanation, and so I can't comment on how it relates
> to the ILP model.
> Will
> __________
> View the list's information and change your settings at
> //

When you say "I wrote a program that crashed Windows," people just
stare at you blankly and say "Hey, I got those with the system, for
Linus Torvalds
View the list's information and change your settings at 

Other related posts: