that wont help that much, we need someone who can help us with changing debian-architecture On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 21:01 +0300, Taras Kostiak wrote: > Prolly woods can help since he packaged freeciv for debian.(or that was > not him?) > > We need some debian packaging experts now... :( > > i686 is a pentium pro or better, I vote for i686. > > On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 17:52 -0700, daaawg wrote: > >> I think this is one of the reasons you start with a mission plan. If > >> the mission is to support older hardware as well as newer, then > >> architecture support realistically includes everything from 486 > >> upwards. If middle of the road, 586+; cutting edge then 686 with > >> emphasis on dual core optimization and of course 64 bit. However, we > >> must keep in mind that we'll need the hardware to compile and test, > >> not to mention personnel! > >> I don't see much use in supporting anything older than 586. > >> > >> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Andrew Sorensen <aos@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Do we have any plans about archs we will support? > >> i386 i486 i586 or i686 (x64 will be there also) > >> but for 32bits will be use? > >> i386 i486 i586 or i686? (google them if u dont know what is > >> what) > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> The word 'politics' is derived from the word 'poly', meaning 'many', > >> and the word 'ticks', meaning 'blood sucking parasites'. > >> - Larry Hardiman > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >