[Precisionix-General] Re: Start building distro
- From: daaawg <cdaaawg@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: precisionix-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:52:07 -0700
I think this is one of the reasons you start with a mission plan. If the
mission is to support older hardware as well as newer, then architecture
support realistically includes everything from 486 upwards. If middle of the
road, 586+; cutting edge then 686 with emphasis on dual core optimization
and of course 64 bit. However, we must keep in mind that we'll need the
hardware to compile and test, not to mention personnel!
I don't see much use in supporting anything older than 586.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Andrew Sorensen <aos@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Do we have any plans about archs we will support?
> i386 i486 i586 or i686 (x64 will be there also)
> but for 32bits will be use?
> i386 i486 i586 or i686? (google them if u dont know what is what)
>
>
>
--
The word 'politics' is derived from the word 'poly', meaning 'many', and the
word 'ticks', meaning 'blood sucking parasites'.
- Larry Hardiman
Other related posts:
