I'd have to agree on the 686. Know of any good debian packaging how-to web sites? On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Andrew Sorensen <aos@xxxxxxx> wrote: > We need some debian packaging experts now... :( > i686 is a pentium pro or better, I vote for i686. > On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 17:52 -0700, daaawg wrote: > > I think this is one of the reasons you start with a mission plan. If > > the mission is to support older hardware as well as newer, then > > architecture support realistically includes everything from 486 > > upwards. If middle of the road, 586+; cutting edge then 686 with > > emphasis on dual core optimization and of course 64 bit. However, we > > must keep in mind that we'll need the hardware to compile and test, > > not to mention personnel! > > I don't see much use in supporting anything older than 586. > > > > On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Andrew Sorensen <aos@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Do we have any plans about archs we will support? > > i386 i486 i586 or i686 (x64 will be there also) > > but for 32bits will be use? > > i386 i486 i586 or i686? (google them if u dont know what is > > what) > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > The word 'politics' is derived from the word 'poly', meaning 'many', > > and the word 'ticks', meaning 'blood sucking parasites'. > > - Larry Hardiman > > > > > > > -- The word 'politics' is derived from the word 'poly', meaning 'many', and the word 'ticks', meaning 'blood sucking parasites'. - Larry Hardiman