I like Sam's idea and think it's fair On Oct 14, 2014, at 3:14 PM, Terri <starstuff@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I have to send this out through PASmembers list because the Star Tours list > is a NO POST - Announcement Only list. So, the discussion will be here. > > Sam brought up a good idea and we are looking for input about it before I put > this plan into affect. > > The issue is that when I post a "JOB" meaning a Paid event, some people are > able to get signed up for them quicker than others (not counting me). I post > it, I can sign up right away, or decline it right away. > > So, Sam proposes that we make a rotating list. On the list will be the > PAStimes Star Tour members who are actively doing star parties for $$. And > when a new event comes to my attention, I ask the next star tour member in > line, on that list, if they can cover that event. If they can, they are put > on the approved list. If they can't, they get put at the bottom of the list > to run through it again. WE currently have, I think 12 members on the list - > 10 if you don't count William and me. > So, the 10 of you would cycle through, allowing each member an equal chance > to do an event. > > So, let's say that the order is > > Kevin > Howard > Eric > Sam > > and we get an event for 3 scopes (not counting schools and scout events). > > Kevin and Howard can do the date in question but Eric can't, but the three of > them get asked. Eric declines, > Sam takes his place, Eric is then moved to the bottom of the list and cycle > through again. > > Sam writes: > Terri, what I would like to suggest is that when you get a high paying star > tours gig , like $100 per scope or more, then we have a rotating list of our > star tours people. This way, it is totally fair, and we each get a shot, > rather than have you announce a high paying gig and have it already filled. > For example, if a customer wants 3 scopes and it pays $100 or more per scope, > then you refer to the star tours list and the next 3 people get first crack > at it. If someone can't take it , it goes to the 4th person on the list. > Then, the next gig goes to the next person in line. > > Now, the person who declined, do they go to the top of the list or the > bottom? What do you think is fair? Do they get first shot at the next job > that comes along? > > Give me your input. Let's discuss this. > Everyone will be on that list except William and me. > If i do a paid event, I will have William with me, but we will > not always do 2 scopes. So, we may both attend but only do 1 scope at that > job, depends on what we are needed for. > > Thanks for your input and thank you Sam for coming up with an idea to make > this more fair. So, i await everyone's input, whether you are on the Star > Tours team or not. I"d just like to get some input. > > One thing to keep in mind.... There are certain jobs where the size of the > scope matters. And there are jobs where they request certain scopes, such as > Eric's 22" or Bruce's 20" from past events they have attended. If they do, we > go with what is requested first, then open it to the rest of the Team members. > And Mike, if he is requested, gets the job, if he can attend. > > So, send me input. What do you think of this plan. We have enough scopes that > rotating them like this, would make a good way to give everyone a chance to > make some extra income to pay for your equipment upgrades. I"m all for this > idea. > > Terri > > Thanks again Sam. > We will implement this plan by the end of this month. So, set the discussion > in motion and by Oct 31, i want to know we have a this or some other idea > organized. > > > > > > > > -- > Good friends are like stars. You don't always > see them, but you always know they are there. > Terri Phoenix Astronomical Society Event Coordinator > Visit the P.A.S. Facebook Page & My Facebook Page > Visit my Music Page: Private Music Instructor & Music Facebook Page