RE: ZERO Database Downtime???
- To: "oracle-l" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 11:21:05 -0800
For a while they were saying that a Shared Oracle Home
for RAC was a bad idea because "you can't do a rolling upgrade"
with a single shared Oracle Home. Then people started calling them
on the fact that you can't do a rolling upgrade AT ALL without
Data Guard involvement...
marketing
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael Fontana
>>>Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 10:35 AM
>>>To: Jared Still; davidsharples@xxxxxxxxx
>>>Cc: Thomas.Mercadante@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>Subject: RE: ZERO Database Downtime???
>>>
>>>Excuse me, but "little or no" is not the same as "Zero Downtime".
>>>
>>>A logical SQL apply is also not feasible in a large
>>>installation, or if there is complexity, such as RAC.
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
