Re: Slightly OT: SQL Server conference vs. Oracle conferences...

From: "Rich Jesse" <rjoralist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 11:22:33 -0600 (CST)

> here. I've yet to see a presentation that wows me as I have from the likes

That's because everyone's busy truncating their logs, trying in vain to
analyze over aggressive locking schemes, and defragging indexes.

;)

Rich


--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

References:
- FW: No bind peeking - why?
  - From: Bobak, Mark
- Slightly OT: SQL Server conference vs. Oracle conferences...
  - From: Robert Freeman

Other related posts:

» Slightly OT: SQL Server conference vs. Oracle conferences...- Robert Freeman
» Re: Slightly OT: SQL Server conference vs. Oracle conferences... - Rich Jesse
» Re: Slightly OT: SQL Server conference vs. Oracle conferences...- Niall Litchfield
» Re: Slightly OT: SQL Server conference vs. Oracle conferences...- Robert Freeman
» Re: Slightly OT: SQL Server conference vs. Oracle conferences...- Niall Litchfield
» Re: Slightly OT: SQL Server conference vs. Oracle conferences...- Michael Fontana
» Re: Slightly OT: SQL Server conference vs. Oracle conferences...- Robert Freeman
» Re: Slightly OT: SQL Server conference vs. Oracle conferences...- Kellyn Pedersen
» Re: Slightly OT: SQL Server conference vs. Oracle conferences...- Robert Freeman
» RE: Slightly OT: SQL Server conference vs. Oracle conferences...- Goulet, Richard
» Re: Slightly OT: SQL Server conference vs. Oracle conferences...- Kellyn Pedersen