Re: SAN evaluation

  • From: "Jared Still" <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: oracledba.williams@xxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 10:39:42 -0700

On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Dennis Williams <
oracledba.williams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>
> That may be it. But I'm specifically thinking about what circumstances you
> need to take the SAN offline. I'm not sure how this is reflected in MTBF. As
> a specific example, I have seen a comparison between NetApp and EMC. A lot
> of money could be saved by using NetApp, but there were more situations
> where the SAN would have to come offline. For example, I understand that you
> can apply an upgrade to the EMC without taking it offline. My point is that
> you need to understand the criticality of your application and determine
> whether the availability of the SAN would meet your requirements.
>

An issue that I have not seen addressed is technical support.

We have found our experiences with NetApp support much more
palatable than those with EMC support.

Here's an example from someone else:

 http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=678938&tstart=50

 We have had several such experiences with EMC support.



-- 
Jared Still
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist

Other related posts: