RE: SAN evaluation
- From: "Matthew Zito" <mzito@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <Tom.Terrian.ctr@xxxxxxx>, "ORACLE-L Freelists" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 12:15:31 -0400
Definitely find out about the manageability of the platform - how hard
is it to make configuration changes, are there restrictions on LUN/raid
group sizing, what are the limits on number of attached hosts, exposed
LUNs, etc.
Also, ask the vendors for information against each other - while some of
it is going to be FUD, you can often find out about issues or weaknesses
in their offerings that would be relevant to your environment that the
vendor might have been glossing over during your discussions.
I would definitely put a vote in for NetApp - lots of flexibility, good
performance, multiprotocol, outstanding snapshot capability.
Thanks,
Matt
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Terrian, Thomas J Mr
CTR DLA J6DIB
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 7:19 AM
To: ORACLE-L Freelists
Subject: SAN evaluation
We have just begun the process of evaluating a new SAN vendor. We are
presently developing a list of criteria/requirements/questions for the
new vendor. So far we have come up with the following:
1. What is their I/O speed.
2. What kind of SAN replication options do they offer.
3. Presently we are using RAID 5. I would like to move to RAID 0+1.
What do they recommend?
4. Does their product have any Oracle related features. For example, I
know that HP has a SAN developed specifically for an Oracle warehouse.
Does their product have any bells and whistles for RAC, Streams, etc.
Has anyone gone through a similar exercise where they had to evaluate a
SAN vendor? If so, could you share your thoughts with the list?
Thanks,
Tom
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
