Re: Metrics for Swingbench benchmarks
- From: "Jeremy Schneider" <jeremy.schneider@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "John Hallas" <john.hallas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:25:16 -0400
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:44 AM, John Hallas <john.hallas@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> The main misunderstanding I have is the difference between 95% and 90%.
> The 2nd node is available but not in use. I know there will be heartbeat
> and other maintenance work going on and I am also aware that the cache
> fusion will keep the 2 SGAs in sync, however I have been searching for more
> information on what is happening in the preffered/available modes and any
> thoughts appreciated.
>
When you say "preferred/available" are you referring to the "Service" you
created? If so then the only effect of this is that all connections are
going to the preferred node - however the other node is up and running and
fully part of the cluster.
One thing that comes to mind right away - even though your second node is
"not in use" it still maintains a complete mirror of the GRD (global
resource directory - things like cluster-wide locks). Also, there's a good
amount of additional messaging related to SCN generation. Just some shots
in the dark, but I wonder if you could statically force all lock masters to
the preferred node and decrease SCN traffic by tweaking something like the
MAX_COMMIT_PROPOGATION_DELAY init param? That might get you some of those
percents back...
**
PS - I'm loving this whole thread because it's a perfect example of the
bogus hype around RAC. Clustering is powerful technology and honestly, a
lot of applications will scale well with no modifications on RAC. (The
well-designed ones.) But clustering is complicated and if a sales person
gives the impression that you can just run any application on RAC to make it
magically faster -- baloney!!!!
--
Jeremy Schneider
Chicago, IL
http://www.ardentperf.com/category/technical
Other related posts:
