Re: HTML DB - here to stay?

  • From: Yechiel Adar <adar76@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:14:44 +0200

When I checked it, using OID just for name resolution does not cost money :-)

Adar Yechiel
Rechovot, Israel

Weiss, Rick wrote:

Oracle Names was removed because they discovered a new revenue stream in
dragging those of us who wanted that functionality into OID and the
wonderful Application Server world

Rick Weiss Oracle Database Administrator Montana Department of Labor & Industry Centralized Services Division Technical Services Bureau 1327 Lockey P.O. Box 1728 Helena, Montana 59624-1728 (406) 444-9628 rweiss@xxxxxx

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kirtikumar Deshpande
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 4:00 PM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: HTML DB - here to stay?

...and the other product that comes to my mind is Oracle Names. It had
its share of trouble in the early versions, but once it stabilized, it
was discontinued... We have
both: Oracle Names and Designer... very heavily used.. :(

- Kirti

--- ryan_gaffuri@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Oracle has a track record of saying this is the direction we are going

and then changing their mind. If you go to the ODTUG listservs and ask

about this they will point out their history with Oracle Designer. Oracle convinced alot of people to spend alot of time(years in many cases) to become very proficient with designer. Many people designed full development processes around it. Oracle has ceased adding new features to it. Doesn't even cover hash partitions. Its still a good

tool, but its clearly slowly fading away.

Wasn't there some web based technology oracle was talking about in 2000-2001, that just dissappeared?

__________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 -- //


Other related posts: