RE: HA options

  • From: Rahul Choubey <choubeyrahul97@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 21:44:56 +0530

Hi,
  Have you tried the option of far sync.

Thanks & Regards,

Rahul Choubey
+91-8879403896

On 19-Jun-2017 9:24 PM, "Reen, Elizabeth" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

            I agree, but my management seems to be believing all of the
spin on the cloud.  Thanks to all for the suggestions.  There isn’t much
out there, but I can say I covered all of the bases.





Liz







*From:* oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@
freelists.org] *On Behalf Of *Mladen Gogala
*Sent:* Saturday, June 17, 2017 2:06 PM
*To:* oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: HA options



On 06/15/2017 01:08 PM, Reen, Elizabeth (Redacted sender elizabeth.reen
for DMARC) wrote:

  I’m thinking about that, but don’t really see the difference between it
and dataguard.

The only difference is the price: for fail-over cluster, you don't need
another instance, which means that your budget will take a much smaller hit.

--

Mladen Gogala

Oracle DBA

Tel: (347) 321-1217


Other related posts: