Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- From: Mladen Gogala <gogala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: makbo@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 04:16:47 +0000
On 06/14/2005 11:53:02 PM, Mark Bole wrote:
> This must be the first time in decades that I have seen the word "lemma"=20
> used in what one might call "ordinary" conversation... ;-)
>=20
> Congratulations!
>=20
Conversations on this list are anything but ordinary. Here is another word =
that
you might like, if your taste is perverted the same way as mine: "corollary=
".
You may also enjoy dirty words like "theorem", "proof", "Q.E.D" phrases lik=
e=20
"if and only if", "Cauchy sequence" and similar. From your liking of the wo=
rd "lemma",=20
I conclude that your college major wasn't in liberal arts.
Thanks for your support!
--=20
Mladen Gogala
Oracle DBA
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
- » Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » RE: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » RE: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » RE: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » RE: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date
- » Re: Database in depth, by C.J. Date