Madhu, I would like to propose again to look for another solution. Host based mirroring to remote storage box will most probably give you a lot of problems managing it. I am not even talking about performance (well, you might just have a nice dark fiber laid there).
Please consider Oracle Data Guard or your vendor's technology. For example, look at Disaster Recovery Issues and Solutions from Hitachi's web site (http://www.hds.com/download.html?url=/pdf/wp_117_02_disaster_recovery.pdf®ion=global&id=219&type=White%20Papers&lang=English&title=Disaster%20Recovery%20Issues%20and%20Solutions).
Excellent inputs. Thanks to all of you !!
ASM might not be a best option for me by considering a two node cluster w/ very large amounts of data getting mirrored across two storage arrays. So my other option would be GPFS. Are there any similar/other concerns with GPFS in the same architecture ?
regards, Madhu
Alex Gorbachev wrote: Salem, if you have a descent size database than it's quite dangerous option. I mentioned reference to my blog in previous post - if you read it you will understand why. Even short interruption in connectivity to remote site might cause ASM to start rebalancing and recovery from this is a non-trivial task.
Replication via Oracle Data Guard or third party tools is a much better option. Just storing backups remotely is a much more reliable alternative than distance storage box with ASM.
2006/5/19, Ghassan Salem <salem.ghassan@xxxxxxxxx>:
1- you can use ASM to mirror your data on the remote site, mainly by using a 'failover' disk group. It's very easy to setup.
-- Best regards, Alex Gorbachev
http://oracloid.blogspot.com -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l