Re: DB performance after upgrade from 9i to 11gR2

  • From: Sayan Sergeevich Malakshinov <malakshinovss@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: baitha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 11:29:27 +0400

I would start with checking the parameters:

select  name as parameter
       ,decode
         (p.type
         ,1,'boolean'
         ,2,'string'
         ,3,'number'
         ,4,'file'
         ,6,'size(bytes)'
         ,'Unknown: '||p.type) type
       ,description
       ,decode(p.type,6,p.display_value,p.value) as value
       ,update_comment
       ,ISMODIFIED
       ,ISADJUSTED
       ,ISDEPRECATED
       ,ISBASIC
       ,ISSES_MODIFIABLE
       ,ISSYS_MODIFIABLE
       ,ISINSTANCE_MODIFIABLE
from v$parameter p 
where p.isdefault='FALSE'
and p.name not like 'log_archive_dest%'
/

--
Best regards, 
Sayan Malakshinov
http://orasql.org

> 2014-05-08 8:39 GMT+02:00 Bheemsen Aitha <baitha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> ...Some of the queries have differences in plan (FTS to index scans on 
small tables) 
> when compared to QA environment. We gathered stats with default auto 
> sample size and default method_opt options.
> Thanks
> BA
>  

Other related posts: