RE: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- From: "Kevin Closson" <kevinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:06:28 -0800
what does "NFS of CFS" mean? Exporting a CFS? Yeah, that's
being done. It's called the StorageWorks Enterprise File Server Clustered
Gateway
by HP. Up to 16 nodes of scalable NFS with transparent NFS client failover in
the
event a NAS head should fail. And when I say transparent, I mean it. Oracle
CRS, and database processes have no idea that the NAS head serviing up their
files has died. Not exactly the typical filer experience. Yeah, I know you can
"cluster"
and replicate filers. The HP EFS/CG requires no replication for this high
availability/
scalability. Want to know how I know ?
________________________________
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Maimon Oded
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 1:16 AM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
i know some companies that have RAC in site license. but let's change
the discussion to something else.
NFS of CFS?
On 12/29/05, Kevin Closson <kevinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
sometimes man bites dog
:-)
________________________________
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ] On Behalf Of rjamya
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 6:40 PM
To: tanel.poder.003@xxxxxxx
Cc: ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in
Oracle RAC
We are licensed for all rdbms products/options. We can
use them whenever ... so that helps.
Rjamya
On 12/28/05, Tanel Põder < tanel.poder.003@xxxxxxx
<mailto:tanel.poder.003@xxxxxxx> > wrote:
Kevin is right, as much as I've seen none of
the site licenses have had RAC
included, most of my customers have even had to
pay for partitioning extra
(although discounted) price.
Other related posts:
