Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- From: Anand Rao <panandrao@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Oracle-L <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:51:40 +0530
You are joking....right?
anand
On 29/12/05, Maimon Oded <oded.maimon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> i know some companies that have RAC in site license. but let's change the
> discussion to something else.
>
> NFS of CFS?
>
> On 12/29/05, Kevin Closson <kevinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > sometimes man bites dog
> >
> > :-)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> > *From:* oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > ] *On Behalf Of *rjamya
> > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 28, 2005 6:40 PM
> > *To:* tanel.poder.003@xxxxxxx
> > *Cc:* ORACLE-L
> > *Subject:* Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
> >
> >
> > We are licensed for all rdbms products/options. We can use them
> > whenever ... so that helps.
> >
> > Rjamya
> >
> > On 12/28/05, Tanel Põder < tanel.poder.003@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Kevin is right, as much as I've seen none of the site licenses have
> > > had RAC
> > > included, most of my customers have even had to pay for partitioning
> > > extra
> > > (although discounted) price.
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Other related posts:
