Re: 10g on unix. Partitions... Tablespaces... and best practices
- From: "Jared Still" <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "April Wells" <awells@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:20:21 -0800
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:27 AM, April Wells <awells@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
> When I have to move this off of solaris and onto Linux (don't ask) it
> will probably take a little longer to do that conversion…
>
> In general, I guess the idea is that the more tablespaces you have to pay
> attention to growth of the more you have to pay attention so it is more
> work.
>
> I know that a lot of the "hey lets toss her under the bus" that went with
> this was more like diverting attention from what the left hand was doing
> ("Hey… look… it's a shiny chicken!!! Pay no attention to the man behind the
> curtain"). But then, right now, I'm a bit jaded…
>
> Well, no, I genuinely wanted to know what the concerns are.
There are times when a large number of tablespaces may cause more work,
but for day to day activities, I don't see where it matters.
If automatic monitoring of any kind is setup, I don't think it is any more
difficult
to manage 100 TBS than it is to manage 10.
Jared
Other related posts:
