Re: 10g on Win32
- From: Jared.Still@xxxxxxxxxxx
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 13:27:28 -0800
Well, it is 10.1 after all.
Wait, you're probably right. I bet there isn't a 10.0 release.
Jared
"Juan Cachito Reyes Pacheco" <jreyes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
03/25/2004 11:10 AM
Please respond to oracle-l
To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc:
Subject: Re: 10g on Win32
Sorry Jared, an out of post question, as you have more experience,
My impression based in Oracle 9i and 7 is, every time there is a new
version from Oracle Database,
you must wait the second release to work, usually the first release need
some tune of new features.
Or I'm wrong
----- Original Message -----
From: Jared.Still@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 2:04 PM
Subject: 10g on Win32
Just wondering what others experiences are installing this version.
Did you perhaps find that there is no new version of the Oracle Home
Selector?
And that even if you hack the registry so that the old OHS can find the
new
Oracle 10g registry entries, it still does not set the PATH correctly?
There are at least 2 OH path entries now for 10g. The standard OH/bin and
now the OH/jre/bin. OHS does not correctly alter the PATH by moving both
entries to the front of the list.
I say 'at least two' because during installation it occurred that the PATH
on
my laptop would exceed 1023 characters and I chose to ignore the error.
Perhaps a re-install would fix this.
sigh... silly me. I thought the days of worrying about PATH size were
over.
Jared
Other related posts:
