RE: 10g on Win32
- From: Jared.Still@xxxxxxxxxxx
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 13:29:45 -0800
I don't have a choice on my laptop.
"Bobak, Mark" <Mark.Bobak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
03/25/2004 11:15 AM
Please respond to oracle-l
To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc:
Subject: RE: 10g on Win32
"Oracle Home Selector"?? "Registry Hacks"?? Sound to me like a poor
choice of OS! ;-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Justin Cave (DDBC) [mailto:jcave@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 1:35 PM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: 10g on Win32
The lack of an entry in the Oracle Home Selector is certainly an issue.
On both the systems I installed, the new 10g Enterprise Manager complains
that the "database status is unavailable", so EM won't allow me to do
anything other than start & stop the database. The 10g listener also
seems to have problems with the 8.1.7 and/or 9.2 databases on my
development system, though I haven't spent a lot of time dealing with this
particular issue.
I also noticed that if I tried to connect to an 8.1.7 system from a 10g
client, it complains about an unsupported connection type-- I believe it's
the same error you get if you try to connect a 9.2 client to an Oracle 7
system. I thought that 10g -> 8.1.7 was supported, though.
Justin Cave
Distributed Database Consulting, Inc.
http://www.ddbcinc.com/askDDBC
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Jared.Still@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 11:04 AM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: 10g on Win32
Just wondering what others experiences are installing this version.
Did you perhaps find that there is no new version of the Oracle Home
Selector?
And that even if you hack the registry so that the old OHS can find the
new
Oracle 10g registry entries, it still does not set the PATH correctly?
There are at least 2 OH path entries now for 10g. The standard OH/bin and
now the OH/jre/bin. OHS does not correctly alter the PATH by moving both
entries to the front of the list.
I say 'at least two' because during installation it occurred that the PATH
on
my laptop would exceed 1023 characters and I chose to ignore the error.
Perhaps a re-install would fix this.
sigh... silly me. I thought the days of worrying about PATH size were
over.
Jared
Other related posts:
