[optimal] Re: Zeiss Cirrus problem

  • From: "Aleman, Wendy" <Wendy.Aleman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 12:57:14 -0500

I can tell you we have had the same kind of issue here.   We have gotten a NAS 
drive and offloaded some of the tests from the machine and that has made it 
much quicker (we see a big improvement in speed).

 

Wendy Aleman

Special Projects Manager

University of Pennsylvania

Scheie Eye Institute

51 N 39th Street

Philadelphia, PA 19104

Cell:  215-359-5115

Wendy.aleman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

 

From: optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of copcphotography@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 12:50 PM
To: optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [optimal] Zeiss Cirrus problem

 

Hello all

 

Having a problem with the Cirrus OCT - for the first three years that I've been 
using this machine I have been able to do mac cubes and rnfls OU, then just as 
soon as the machine was done moving from finishing the scans, would be able to 
analyze the scans for printing.  I could quickly review the scans make sure I 
had all the info I wanted or if any scans needed additional takes. All was 
peachy. 

 

Then blue screen of death that the harddrive was in serious trouble, machine 
crashing, ... .  Now, service call in, repairs made, the motherboard was 
replaced, the machine has slowed down to a snails pace - have time to walk the 
patient back to the waiting area, then am only able to analyze the first mac 
cube, and have to keep waiting an additional two-three minutes before being 
able to start the analysis on the second mac cube, never mind the rnfls!  

 

What is the cause of this delay?  I was told it was a server issue (being in a 
remote office), but the server is in our primary office and that machine has 
had these delay issues from day one!!!  The machine I use was the fast one.  

 

I don't buy the 'server' being the problem, but haven't gotten any more 
credible answers to what the problem is.

 

Anyone have suggestions?

 

Thanks

 

Lori Guerette, CRA COA

 

justhitanykey@xxxxxxxxxxx if you want to reply offline

 



The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the 
personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of 
this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for 
delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have 
received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, 
distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, 
and delete the original message.

Other related posts: