[optimal] Re: Film scanner w/feeder

  • From: Allen Katz <alkatz2000@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 10:51:59 -0600

Well Done brewmeister!  

I believe the late Paul M used to send slides to be scanned overseas for 
pennies each?   Maybe that was pre hippa

> On Dec 12, 2013, at 10:46 AM, "Bennett, Timothy" <tbennett1@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
> wrote:
> 
> No, cash is better.
>  
> I have plenty of beer right now. Just installed a new kegerator and have 5 
> brews (blonde, saison, amber, brown, rye ) on tap. Have an apple cider 
> cold-crashing now, a pale ale in primary, a Cascadian dark ale aging on oak, 
> and several brews bottle conditioning now for the holiday season: Belgian 
> Strong,  jalapeno ale, Imperial Espresso Stout.
>  
> I’ve been busy!
>  
> tim
>  
> From: optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Steffens, Timothy
> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 11:39 AM
> To: optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [optimal] Re: Film scanner w/feeder
>  
> Or do you want to be paid in beer?
>  
> Thanks,
>  
> Tim Steffens, CRA
> Director of Ophthalmic Imaging
> University of Michigan Kellogg Eye Center
> 1000 Wall Street
> Ann Arbor, MI 
> P: 734-936-2283
> tjsteffe@xxxxxxxxx
>  
> From: <Bennett>, Tim Bennett <tbennett1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: "optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thursday, December 12, 2013 11:38 AM
> To: "optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [optimal] Re: Film scanner w/feeder
>  
> I’ll do it for half that ;-)
>  
> tim
>  
> From: optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Steffens, Timothy
> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 11:36 AM
> To: optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [optimal] Re: Film scanner w/feeder
>  
> Outsourcing this project will cost us about $500,000. 
>  
> Thanks,
>  
> Tim Steffens, CRA
> Director of Ophthalmic Imaging
> University of Michigan Kellogg Eye Center
> 1000 Wall Street
> Ann Arbor, MI 
> P: 734-936-2283
> tjsteffe@xxxxxxxxx
>  
> From: <Verdick>, Randall E <randall-verdick@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: "optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thursday, December 12, 2013 10:52 AM
> To: "optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [optimal] Re: Film scanner w/feeder
>  
> Hi Tim
> We have done similar project. Very, very time consuming. We stille have the 
> Nikon 5000 and it is SLOW. What we did was put a digital camera on a slide 
> projector and load slide trays – went much faster and the resolution was 
> good. We also had a slide projector converted to a slide cleaner called the 
> “car wash”. It used compressed air to blow dust off the slides, which were 
> dirty – even in slide sleeves.  This is now set upo at a Kinkos Copy center 
> here I believe. You might consider outsourcing this massive project?
>  
> Randall Verdick, FOPS
> Educational Media Coordinator
> Department of Ophthalmology
> University of Iowa
>  
>  
>  
> From:optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Steffens, Timothy
> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 9:43 AM
> To: optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [optimal] Film scanner w/feeder
>  
> Hi all,
>  
> I'm looking to purchase a scanner with an auto feeder. Kellogg wants to start 
> scanning in all the old patient slides and start a teaching file. I use to 
> use a Nikon scanner at Indiana University similar to this one 
> http://www.nikonusa.com/en/Nikon-Products/Product-Archive/Film-Scanners/9238/Super-COOLSCAN-5000-ED.html
>  
> Does anyone know of a good one to purchase or have one they are willing to 
> sell with an auto feeder?
>  
> Thanks,
>  
> Tim Steffens, CRA
> Director of Ophthalmic Imaging
> University of Michigan Kellogg Eye Center
> 1000 Wall Street
> Ann Arbor, MI 
> P: 734-936-2283
> tjsteffe@xxxxxxxxx
> **********************************************************
> Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be 
> used for urgent or sensitive issues
> 
>  
> 
> Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the 
> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is confidential 
> and may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you 
> are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or 
> copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  Please reply to the 
> sender that you have received the message in error, then delete it.  Thank 
> you.
> **********************************************************
> Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be 
> used for urgent or sensitive issues
> 
> **********************************************************
> Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be 
> used for urgent or sensitive issues

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. optimal
  3. Archive
  4. 12-2013