Companies like Pixelworks do "magic" on the signal to compensate for LCD lag... At 07:55 AM 1/10/2005, Doug McDonald wrote: >John Golitsis wrote: > >> To catch interlace artifacts, you'd have to be looking at a scene with >> motion. LCD is slow, leaving visible motion blur. > >That is simply incorrect. I have actually MEASURED the LCD >lag on my very own, now two years and five months old, >Panasonic PT40LC12 RPLCD set. > >To do this I watched as repetitive test patterns from the >Digital Video Essentials disk passed a given point, using >a fast (50 microsecond) photodiode and a digital scope. > >The resulting time curves are highly non-exponential, >they change more like a linear ramp than an exponential, >though the tail end is sort of Gaussian. The fall time >(white->black) is 5 milliseconds, the rise time is >16 milliseconds. These are 10 to 90% times. > >Since the rise time is worse than the fall time, I looked >with my eyes very hard at a test for this, a black hockey >puck moving across the white ice. I could see no trailing >due to the LCD display. I tried both digital and analog >sources. This is a fairly poor test, since even on an >old CRT TV set with analog NTSC source the puck is hard to see. >But I could not find a better test. I tried to find an >auto race where black fence posts are panned across >a bright background, but the sources were so blurred >at the camera that I failed to find one. There were plenty >of scenes at the Olympics that would have worked if >they had been in native 720@60p, but the Euro-crap >50Hz source made this impossible. > >At 5 milliseconds this is a complete non-issue. At >16 milliseconds it is an issue, but apparently not actually >noticeable. > >Doug McDonald ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.