[opendtv] Re: Spam Filter?
- From: John Golitsis <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 10:13:28 -0500
To catch interlace artifacts, you'd have to be looking at a scene with
motion. LCD is slow, leaving visible motion blur. DLP has what others
are calling "temporal dithering". AND, very few sets with these
technologies have a native resolution of 1920x1080, so there's scaling
happening, on top of deinterlacing.
With all those factors taken into account, how can anyone possibly
conclude that the artifacts they're seeing are due to interlace?
On 10-Jan-05, at 9:59 AM, Craig Birkmaier wrote:
>
> I'll second that, and note that NONE of these display technologies
> have artifacts that can easily be confused with interlace artifacts.
> Contouring, the lack of detail in dark and bright regions, color
> fringing (single chip DLP) , and colorimetry issues as DISPLAY
> artifacts.
>
> The biggest problem continues to be that which Tom alluded to:
>
> It is very difficult to do a good job de-interlacing in the receiver
> as opposed to using a high(er) quality professional system prior to
> encoding for emission. It get's even harder if the receiver is
> forced to work with a noisy analog signal (aka cable) or a trashed
> MP@ML encoding that presents the de-interlace chip with excessive
> quantization noise (AKA DBS).
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
Other related posts:
