[opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- From: "John Golitsis" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:48:52 -0400
What exactly is more robust about it? Does the signal travel through air
better? Does it bounce off buildings less?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Miller" <bob@xxxxxxxxxx>
> The point is not that COFDM can go to a higher bitrate but that at an
> equal or slightly higher bitrate it is still more robust than 8-VSB.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
Other related posts:
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400
- » [opendtv] Re: (No Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:30:37 -0400