I think the intro is misleading. The point of the article is that the Janet Jackson silliness proved that even subscription services are not immune to censorship. One ought to conclude that forcing the censorship issue could just as easily result in *less* control over the traditional broadcasters as it could result in more control over subscription services. So this "tectonic shift" seems like hyperbole. "By just one vote, a Senate amendment was defeated in committee that would have imposed these rules and fines not just on broadcasters, but on cable and satellite providers too. Another Senate amendment proposed the regulation of 'excessive violence' in media. ... "If Congress or the FCC try to impose traditional content regulations on Stern-or anyone else operating in the new media space (cable, satellite or the Internet)-it will force the constitutional question of whether government can and should censor the media in the future." Bert ------------------------------------------------ Howard Stern and the Future of Media Censorship Issue #90 October 11, 2004 by Adam Thierer Radio "shock jock" Howard Stern is bolting to satellite radio, signing a five-year deal with SIRIUS beginning in 2006. His transition from broadcast to satellite radio signals a tectonic shift in the center of media power away from traditional providers to new types of outlets and technologies. That much everyone has probably already figured out. What's more interesting, however, is what all this means for the future of media regulation by Washington lawmakers. Consider for a moment just how bad this past year has been for media. ... http://www.cato.org/tech/tk/041011-tk.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.