Yes John, I see what you're saying. Let me state with an example how annoying the distortion can be. If you have seen the acclaimed Shrek movie you will recall a scene where Donkey and Shrek are sitting on a rock/hill top at night with the Moon centre stage in the background. The moon is low on the horizon and so looks rather large. But the moon is not round - it is an EGG! This is ridiculous, and this is done to squeeze in the side information. I am not concerned with the sides. What concerns me is a completely unnatural looking Moon in the centre. Sure, I could put up with a smaller image - about 60% of my screen height, but then (joke) I need binoculars to see the movie. Barry =20 -----Original Message----- From: John Willkie [mailto:johnwillkie@xxxxxxxxxx]=20 Sent: Thursday, 15 July 2004 6:22 a.m. To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [opendtv] Re: 2.35:1 on 16:9 screen (was: Mobile TV coming of age) Just another nit. I believe where you say "while retaining complete proportionality" the safer phrasing would be "while appearing to retain proportionality." Some of these technologies are quite sophisticated at masking what they are doing, but if one is familiar with the content after having seen it on a monitor that does not distort, I would venture that it's a cinch to see what changes when it's been transmogrified in one of these displays. Me, having seen tv on non-deliberately-distorted sets for all my life, I have problems sometimes recognizing stars when I visit a shop with distorto sets. They can brag about their technology all they want, but that doesn't fool my eyes: their sets do. John Willkie -----Original Message----- From: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Barry Wilkins Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 2:29 AM To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [opendtv] Re: 2.35:1 on 16:9 screen (was: Mobile TV coming of age) Thanks John, I've just seen the cure. Yes, Panasonic do produce a proportional zoom on their DVD players. I have just witnessed a demonstration in a local shop. It is the model DV S35. Perhaps all Panasonic models have this function. It has a very good facility. You could increment up and down in small steps using the jog control, while retaining complete proportionality. This unit was at a bargain price of NZ$169. I suppose that's around US$90. Barry wilkins -----Original Message----- From: John Willkie [mailto:johnwillkie@xxxxxxxxxx]=3D20 Sent: Thursday, 15 July 2004 3:44 a.m. To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [opendtv] Re: 2.35:1 on 16:9 screen (was: Mobile TV coming of age) Barry; Just a point of clarification. "Pan and scan" is/was a kludgy way of adapting widescreen content to 4:3 sets. As the term implies, the 4:3 area within the widescreen frame changes to always show the action. It's not, to my knowledge, something that you can see with a DVD, and the practice is rare to see these days. John Willkie -----Original Message----- From: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Barry Wilkins Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 10:33 PM To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [opendtv] Re: 2.35:1 on 16:9 screen (was: Mobile TV coming of age) Jeroen, Please excuse a degree of naivety and ignorance on my part. I am not familiar with picture encoding for DVD. Therefore what follows is presumption. Regarding the availability of 16:9 content, I mean pan and scan, ie. 16:9 non letterboxed. We do not get a lot of this format here,(New Zealand). So, my understanding is, the DVDs are encoded with a widescreen image to preserve the theatrical aspect. This I presume, means that data bits are used only where there is picture information. To then expand this 2.35:1 aspect information to fill a 16:9 screen proportionally will I imagine reduce the resolution dramatically because for the screens dimensions there is a large loss of mainly horizontal pixel information. Cheers Barry -----Original Message----- From: jeroen.stessen@xxxxxxxxxxx =3D [mailto:jeroen.stessen@xxxxxxxxxxx]=3D3D20 Sent: Wednesday, 14 July 2004 11:10 p.m. To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [opendtv] Re: 2.35:1 on 16:9 screen (was: Mobile TV coming of age) Hello, Barry Wilkins asked: > I have a question about the latest Philips 42PF9966 42" plasma TVs. Not to be mistaken with the Philips 42PF9986 42" LCD TVs !! > It concerns the ability or otherwise of being able to expand a > 2.35:1 aspect image to fill the screen vertically while retaining > the correct proportionality of images, i.e. simply eliminating > some of the width to result in 16:9 aspect. There is no such thing as "simply eliminating some of the width" ! Only when there are empty side pillars, or when the picture content is protected by pan-scan vectors, could one safely cut off some of the side information. We have chosen not to do this in our TVs. > I find the present models will not allow this. Have you ever seen a consumer TV/monitor/display that does this, other than by setting up the geometry through some expert menu ? > They either fill the screen but distort the images horizontally, Yes, in the "automatic aspect ratio adaptation mode" it will do vertical zoom up to an aspect ratio of 18:9. The width remains constant. The source sends out a 16:9 signal, so the aspect ratio will then be distorted by a maximum factor of 18/16 =3D3D3D 1.125. > or you have the black bars top and bottom. As it was written on the DVD... The source is the boss ! > I know that many people may prefer to see the whole width but > I would be perfectly content with a larger image that made full > use of the screens proportions. I don't know that. I only remember fierce discussions in this list about the harm of having a few percent of overscan. This is not a subject that I would like to burn my fingers on again. ;-) > So, does this new model allow proportional expansion in both planes? No, unless maybe in the service menu. But not as you would like it. > Do you know if there will be a larger content of source material > in 16:9 aspect? I find that documentaries/drama on DVDs from the > UK/Europe have a larger proportion of 16:9 content. Also, the > quality is generally perfecto! From where are you calling ? 90% of my DVD collection is in 16:9 "anamorphic" format, and a good part of that still has some black bars on the top and bottom. The prices are according to the quality. I want to buy Season 7 of "Buffy", a 6-disc DVD set, uncensored (!), 16:9 and all, but the price of 90 Euro (approx. 110 dollar) is still holding me back. Here you get what you pay for. (Craig, is Santa subscribed to OpenDTV too ? Santa, do you read me ?) > I am very interested in one of these new screens but it is a large > investment for an item that for the majority of the time may not be > utilized efficiently in terms of picture height. You want to wait for screens that are wider than 16:9 ? That should draw Craig into an interesting discussion... ;-) It shouldn't be too difficult to write software for controlling the scalers to do what you want, but I doubt that our product management would see that as a wise move. I could suggest it. > The resolution of the 42PF9966 is I think 1366 X 768. This must be an > NEC type display rather than the Fujitsu 1024 X 1024 type used in > earlier models. Is this prefered because the Alis screen was interlaced > and the new one progressive? No, you are confusing it with the 42PF9986, which is a 42" WXGA LCD. The 42PF9966 has the 1kx1k ALiS. There is a 50PF9966 50" WXGA plasma with a NEC display. There is no ALiS available in that size. Greetings, -- Jeroen. |-----------------------------+---------------------------------------| | From: Jeroen H. Stessen | E-mail: Jeroen.Stessen@xxxxxxxxxxx | |-----------------------------+---------------------------------------| | Building: SFJ-5.22 Eindhoven| Philips Digital Systems Laboratories | |-----------------------------+---------------------------------------| | Phone: ++31.40.27.32739 | Visiting & mail address: Glaslaan 2 | |-----------------------------+---------------------------------------| | Fax: ++31.40.27.32572 | NL 5616 LW Eindhoven, the Netherlands | |-----------------------------+---------------------------------------| | Pager: ++31.6.6513.3818 | Visit us: http://www.pdsl.philips.com/| |-----------------------------+---------------------------------------| =3D3D20 =3D3D20 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org=3D3D20 - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. =3D20 =3D20 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org=3D20 - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. =20 =20 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org=20 - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.